1. Introduction
1.1. Purpose
2. Site Setting
3.1. LNAPL Recovery
4.1. LNAPL Properties
4.2. LNAPL Distribution
- 4.2.1. Comparison of Historical and Recent LIF Results
- 4.2.2. North Olive Stratum
- 4.2.3. Rand Stratum
- 4.2.4. Main Silt Stratum
- 4.2.5. EPA and Main Sand Strata
4.3. LNAPL Recoverability
4.4. LNAPL CSM Summary
6. Vapor Phase
- 6.2.1. SVE System Replacement
- 6.2.2. Stingers
- 6.2.3. Modifications to Controls and Wellhead Completions
- 6.2.4. Thermal Treatment System
- 6.2.5. Routine SVE System Monitoring
- 6.2.6. SVE System Limitations
- 6.3.1. Historical Effectiveness Monitoring
- 6.3.2. Recent Effectiveness Monitoring
- 6.3.3. Soil Vapor Source Distribution
- 6.3.4. TVPH Concentration Trends
- 6.3.5. Summary of Effectiveness Monitoring Results
8.1. Remediation Management Area No. 1
8.2. Remediation Management Area No. 2
8.3. Remediation Management Area No. 3
8.4. Remediation Management Area No. 4
8.5. Remediation Management Area No. 5
8.6. Remediation Management Area No. 6
8.7. Remediation Management Area No. 7
8.8. Remediation Management Area No. 8
8.9. Remediation Management Area No. 9
8.10. Remediation Management Area No. 10
9. References
Tables
Figures
Figure 1-1. Site Layout
Figure 2-1 North Olive Lithology Compare
Figure 2-2 North Market Lithology Compare
Figure 2-3 Isometric CompareFigure 2-4. North Olive Stratum Extent And Isopach
Figure 2-5. Rand Stratum Extent And Isopach
Figure 2-6. Epa Stratum Extent And Isopach
Figure 2-7. Main Silt Extent And Isopach
Figure 3-1. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Recovered Since 1978
Figure 3-2. Vapor Collection System Layout And Production Well Locations
Figure 4-1. LNAPL Characterization And Viscosity Results
Figure 4-2. Benzene Effective Solubility And Dissolved Phase Concentrations
Figure 4-3. Laser Induced Fluorescence Boring And LNAPL Sample Locations
Figure 4-4. Three Dimensional LNAPL Distribution
Figure 4-5. LNAPL Thickness In The Rand Stratum, Low Groundwater
Condition, January 2006Figure 4-6. LNAPL Thickness In The Rand Stratum, Low Groundwater
Condition, March 2015Figure 4-7. LNAPL Thickness In The Rand Stratum, Average Groundwater
Condition, April 2007Figure 4-8. LNAPL Thickness In The Rand Stratum, Average Groundwater
Condition, July 2017Figure 4-9. LNAPL Thickness In The Rand Stratum, High Groundwater
Condition, July 2008Figure 4-10. LNAPL Thickness In The Rand Stratum, High Groundwater
Condition, January 2016Figure 4-11. LNAPL Thickness In The Main Sand Stratum, Low Groundwater
Condition, January 2006Figure 4-12. LNAPL Thickness In The Main Sand Stratum, Low Groundwater
Condition, March 2015Figure 4-13. LNAPL Thickness In The Main Sand Stratum, Average
Groundwater Condition, April 2007Figure 4-14. LNAPL Thickness In The Main Sand Stratum, Average
Groundwater Condition, July 2017Figure 4-15. LNAPL Thickness In The Main Sand Stratum, High Groundwater
Condition, July 2008Figure 4-16. LNAPL Thickness In The Main Sand Stratum, High Groundwater
Condition, January 2016Figure 4-17. Fluid Level Saturations For Soil Cores
Figure 4-18. Schematic Diagram Of Dual Optimal LNAPL Response Model
Figure 5-1. Saturated Thickness North Olive Stratum, Low Groundwater
Conditions, March 2015Figure 5-2. Saturated Thickness North Olive Stratum, High Groundwater
Conditions, January 2016Figure 5-3. Saturated Thickness Rand Stratum, Low Groundwater Conditions,
March 2015Figure 5-4. Saturated Thickness Rand Stratum, High Groundwater Conditions,
January 2016Figure 5-5. Potentiometric Surface Map Main Sand Stratum, Low Groundwater
Conditions, March 2015Figure 5-6. Potentiometric Surface Map Main Sand Stratum, Average
Groundwater Conditions, July 2017Figure 5-7. Hydraulic Head Analysis, Monitoring Point Mp-079d (Zone 1)
Figure 5-8. Hydraulic Head Analysis, Monitoring Point Mp-053c (Zone 5)
Figure 5-9. Hydraulic Head Analysis, Monitoring Point Mp-085d (Zone 6)
Figure 5-10. Detailed Potentiometric Surface Map Main Sand Stratum,
January 2016Figure 5-11. Detailed Potentiometric Surface Map Main Sand Stratum,
April 2016Figure 5-12. Detailed Potentiometric Surface Map Main Sand Stratum,
July 2016Figure 5-13. Detailed Potentiometric Surface Map Main Sand Stratum,
October 2016Figure 5-14. Historical Dissolved Phase Constituents Of Concern, Shallow
Hydrostratigraphic Units (2006 - 2008)Figure 5-15. Dissolved Phase Constituents Of Concern, Shallow
Hydrostratigraphic Units (2013 - 2018)Figure 5-16. Dissolved Phase Constituents Of Concern, Deep
Hydrostratigraphic Units (2013 - 2018)Figure 5-17. Dissolved Phase Natural Attenuation Indicators, Shallow
Hydrostratigraphic Units (2013 - 2018)Figure 5-18. Dissolved Phase Natural Attenuation Indicators, Deep
Hydrostratigraphic Units (2013 - 2018)Figure 5-19. Dissolved Phase Constituents Of Concern And
Hydrogeochemical Indicator Summary Versus DistanceFigure 5-20. Assimilative Capacity Through Centerline
Figure 6-1. Vapor Intrusion Conceptual Site Model
Figure 6-2. Structures With Historical Fire And Odor Complaints
Figure 6-3. Typical Soil Vapor Extraction Wellhead Completion Detail
Figure 6-4. Typical Wellhead, Stinger, And Flowrate Measurement Device
Details For New And Modified Extraction WellsFigure 6-5. Effectiveness Monitoring Network And Lines Of Section
Figure 6-6. Typical Stinger Detail
Figure 6-7. Total Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon Mass Recovery Rate By
SVE Effectiveness ZoneFigure 6-8. Distribution Of Benzene In Soil Vapor Under Low And High River
Stage (2004-2005)Figure 6-9. Distribution Of Isopentane In Soil Vapor Under Low And High
River Stage (2004-2005)Figure 6-10. River Stage Triggered Event Summary (2007 - 2011)
Figure 6-11. River Stage Triggered Event Summary (2012 - 2017)
Figure 6-12. Structures That Have Been Monitored And Mitigated
Figure 6-13. Select Constituents Of Concern Versus Total Volatile Petroleum
Hydrocarbons In Indoor AirFigure 6-14. Vapor Intrusion Pathway Decision Flowchart
Figure 7-1. Site-Specific Attenuation Factors
Figure 8-1. Proposed Remediation Management Areas
Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix B
- APP-B-1_WatkinsStreetSection
- APP-B-2_ForestStreetSection
- APP-B-3_ElmStreetSection
- APP-B-4_DateStreetSection
- APP-B-5_CherryStreetSection
- APP-B-6_BirchStreetSection
Appendix C
- APP_C-1_LIFComparison_HUVOST-002
APP_C-2_LIFComparison_HUVOST-004
APP_C-3_LIFComparison_HUVOST-005
APP_C-4_LIFComparison_HUVOST-007
APP_C-5_LIFComparison_HUVOST-013 - APP_C-6_LIFComparison_HUVOST-019
- APP_C-7_LIFComparison_HUVOST-025
- APP_C-8_LIFComparison_HUVOST-028
- APP_C-9_LIFComparison_HUVOST-029
- APP_C-10_LIFComparison_HUVOST-030
- APP_C-11_LIFComparison_HUVOST-039
- APP_C-12_LIFComparison_HUVOST-040
- APP_C-13_LIFComparison_HUVOST-049
- APP_C-14_LIFComparison_HUVOST-052
- APP_C-15_LIFComparison_HUVOST-066
- APP_C-16_LIFComparison_HUVOST-068
- APP_C-17_LIFComparison_HUVOST-072
- APP_C-18_LIFComparison_HUVOST-078
- APP_C-19_LIFComparison_HUVOST-090
- APP_C-20_LIFComparison_HUVOST-099
- APP_C-21_LIFComparison_HUVOST-113
- APP_C-22_LIFComparison_HUVOST-128
- APP_C-23_LIFComparison_HUVOST-129
- APP_C-24_LIFComparison_HUVOST-130
Appendix D
- APP_D-1-1_LNAPLThicknessTrend_HMW-044B
- APP_D-1-2_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-029C
- APP_D-1-3_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-053B
- APP_D-2-1_LNAPLThicknessTrend_HMW-045C
- APP_D-2-2_LNAPLThicknessTrend_HMW-046C
- APP_D-2-3_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-078D
- APP_D-2-4_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-079C
- APP_D-2-5_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-080C
- APP_D-3-1_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-032B
- APP_D-3-2_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-034C
- APP_D-3-3_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-039C
- APP_D-3-4_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-049C
- APP_D-4-1_LNAPLThicknessTrend_HMW-044C
- APP_D-4-2_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-055C
- APP_D-4-3_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-056C
- APP_D-4-4_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-136
- APP_D-5-1_LNAPLThicknessTrend_HMW-008
- APP_D-5-2_LNAPLThicknessTrend_HMW-010
- APP_D-5-3_LNAPLThicknessTrend_HMW-022
- APP_D-5-4_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-029D
- APP_D-5-5_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-037D
APP_D-5-6_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-041C - APP_D-5-7_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-042C
- APP_D-5-8_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-046C
- APP_D-5-9_LNAPLThicknessTrend_MP-047C
Appendix E
- APP_E-1_Hydrograph_MP-079C
- APP_E-2_Hydrograph_MP-039C
- APP_E-3_Hydrograph_MP-049C
- APP_E-4_Hydrograph_HMW-019
- APP_E-5_Hydrograph_HMW-044C
- APP_E-6_Hydrograph_MP-055C
- APP_E-7_Hydrograph_MP-056C
- APP_E-8_Hydrograph_HMW-048C
- APP_E-9_Hydrograph_MP-029D
- APP_E-10_Hydrograph_RW-005
Appendix F
- APP_F-1_BenzeneAnalysis_HMW-007
- APP_F-2_BenzeneAnalysis_HMW-019
- APP_F-3_BenzeneAnalysis_HMW-038C
- APP_F-4_BenzeneAnalysis_HMW-041B
- APP_F-5_BenzeneAnalysis_HMW-042B
- APP_F-6_BenzeneAnalysis_HMW-045B
- APP_F-7_BenzeneAnalysis_HMW-048A
- APP_F-8_BenzeneAnalysis_HMW-049C
- APP_F-9_BenzeneAnalysis_MP-042B
- APP_F-10_BenzeneAnalysis_MP-056B
- APP_F-11_BenzeneAnalysis_MP-058C
- APP_F-12_BenzeneAnalysis_MP-063C
- APP_F-13_BenzeneAnalysis_MP-078D
- APP_F-14_BenzeneAnalysis_MP-083C
- APP_F-15_BenzeneAnalysis_MP-133
Appendix G
- APP-G-1-1_TVPH_NorthOlive_Jan2006
- APP-G-1-2_TVPH_NorthOlive_Apr2008
- APP-G-1-3_TVPH-MassRecovery_NorthOlive_May2017
- APP-G-1-4_TVPH-MassRecovery_NorthOlive_Nov2017
- APP-G-1-5_O2_NorthOlive_Jan2006
- APP-G-1-6_O2_NorthOlive_Apr2008
- APP-G-1-7_O2_NorthOlive_May2017
- APP-G-1-8_O2_NorthOlive_Nov2017
- APP-G-1-9_CO2_NorthOlive_Jan2006
- APP-G-1-10_CO2_NorthOlive_Apr2008
- APP-G-1-11_CO2_NorthOlive_May2017
- APP-G-1-12_CO2_NorthOlive_Nov2017
- APP-G-2_1_TVPH_Rand_Jan2006
- APP-G-2-2_TVPH_Rand_Apr2008
- APP-G-2-3_TVPH-MassRecovery_Rand_May2017
- APP-G-2-4_TVPH-MassRecovery_Rand_Nov2017
- APP-G-2-5_O2_Rand_Jan2006
- APP-G-2-6_O2_Rand_Apr2008
- APP-G-2-7_O2_Rand_May2017
- APP-G-2-8_O2_Rand_Nov2017.
- APP-G-2-9_CO2_Rand_Jan2006
- APP-G-2-10_CO2_Rand_Apr2008
- APP-G-2-11_CO2_Rand_May2017
- APP-G-2-12_CO2_Rand_Nov2017
Appendix H
- APP_H-1_TVPHTrendChart_MP-029A_B
- APP_H-2_TVPHTrendChart_MP-043A_B
- APP_H-3_TVPHTrendChart_MP-044A_B
- APP_H-4_TVPHTrendChart_VMP-027S_M
- APP_H-5_TVPHTrendChart_VMP_066VS_S_
- APP_H-6_TVPHTrendChart_VMP-070M
- APP_H-7_TVPHTrendChart_VMP-073S_M
- APP_H-8_TVPHTrendChart_VMP-081S_M
- APP_H-9_TVPHTrendChart_VMP-094VS_S
Appendix I
Download Full
Document Here
Conceptual Site Model, March 2018
Hartford Petroleum Release Site
9. REFERENCES
212 Environmental Consulting, LLC (212 Environmental). 2016a. Final Dissolved Phase Investigation Summary Report, Hartford
Petroleum Release Site,Hartford, Illinois. July 15.
212 Environmental Consulting, LLC (212 Environmental). 2016b. Draft Combined Effectiveness Monitoring Workplan, Hartford
Petroleum Release Site, Hartford, Illinois. October 7.
212 Environmental Consulting (212 Environmental), LLC. 2016c. Final Soil Vapor Extraction System Effectiveness Zone 6
Optimization Report, Hartford Petroleum Release Site, Hartford, Illinois. October 26.
212 Environmental Consulting, LLC (212 Environmental). 2016d. “Revised Summary of Lines of Evidence Indicating a Potential
Alternate Source of Petroleum Hydrocarbons beneath Soil Vapor Extraction System Effectiveness Zone 1, Hartford
Petroleum Release Site, Hartford, Illinois” Correspondence received by United States Environmental Protection Agency,
November 15.
212 Environmental Consulting, LLC (212 Environmental). 2017a. Final Semiannual Soil Vapor Extraction System Operations,
Maintenance, and Monitoring Report, October 2015 through March 2016, Hartford Petroleum Release Site, Hartford,
Illinois. July 26.
212 Environmental Consulting, LLC (212 Environmental). 2017b. Semiannual Operations, Maintenance, and Monitoring Report,
October 2016 through March 2017, Hartford Petroleum Release Site, Hartford, Illinois. September 30.
212 Environmental Consulting, LLC (212 Environmental). 2017c. “Proposed Multiphase Remedy Framework Remedial Objectives,
Remediation Goals, and Performance Metrics, Hartford Petroleum Release Site, Hartford, Illinois” Correspondence
received by United States Environmental Protection Agency, December 2.
212 Environmental Consulting, LLC (212 Environmental). 2017d. Summary of Soil Vapor Extraction System Expansion, Hartford
Petroleum Release Site, Hartford, Illinois. Correspondence dated December 5.
212 Environmental Consulting, LLC (212 Environmental). 2018. Semiannual Operations, Maintenance, and Monitoring Report;
April 2017 Through September 2017, Hartford Petroleum Release Site, Hartford, Illinois. January 11.
ASTM International. 2011. Standard Guide for Estimation of LNAPL Transmissivity. E2856 – 11.
January 2012.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). 2010. “Comparison Value Request”
Correspondence received by United States Environmental Protection Agency, March 4.
AECOM Environment. 2009. Draft Event-Based Monitoring Plan, Hartford Hydrocarbon Plume Site.
March 26.
Charbeneau, R. 2007. LNAPL Distribution and Recovery Model (LDRM). Volume 1: Distribution and Recovery of Petroleum
Hydrocarbon Liquids in Porous Media. API Publication 4760. January.
Charbeneau, R., and Beckett, G.D. 2007. LNAPL Distribution and Recovery Model (LDRM). Volume 2: User and Parameter
Selection Guide. API Publication 4760. January.
Clayton Group Services, Inc. (Clayton). 2003a. Current Conditions Report, Premcor Refining Group, Inc. Hartford Refinery and
River Dock, Hartford, Illinois. April 28.
Clayton Group Services, Inc. (Clayton). 2003b. Vapor Control System Evaluation, Village of Hartford, Illinois.
August 14.
Clayton Group Services, Inc. (Clayton). 2003c. Vapor Control System Evaluation Report, Village of Hartford, Illinois.
December 10.
Clayton Group Services, Inc. (Clayton). 2004a. Investigation Plan to Define the Extent of Free Phase and Dissolved Phase
Hydrocarbons in the Village of Hartford, Illinois. January 7.
Clayton Group Services, Inc. (Clayton). 2004b. Detonation Flame Arrestor Element Replacement & Soil Vapor Extraction Pilot
Test Report, Village of Hartford, Illinois. March 4.
Clayton Group Services, Inc. (Clayton). 2004c. Work Plan Utility and Pipeline Investigation Hartford Area Hydrocarbon Plume
Site, Hartford, Illinois. June 29.
Clayton Group Services, Inc. (Clayton). 2004d. Response to Comments – VCS Upgrade Technical Memorandum, The Hartford
Area Hydrocarbon Plume Site, Hartford, Illinois. July 21.
Clayton Group Services, Inc. (Clayton). 2005. LNAPL Active Recovery System Conceptual Site Model, The Hartford Area
Hydrocarbon Plume Site, Hartford, Illinois. December 15.
Clayton Group Services, Inc. (Clayton). 2006. Proposal for an Active LNAPL Recovery System, The Hartford Area Hydrocarbon
Plume Site, Hartford, Illinois. February 2.
Clayton Group Services, Inc., H2A Environmental, Ltd., and URS Corporation (Clayton et al.). 2006. Active LNAPL Recovery
System 90% Design Report, The Hartford Area Hydrocarbon Plume Site, Hartford, Illinois. July 31.
Engineering-Science, Inc. 1992. History of Hydrocarbon Releases in the Village of Hartford, Illinois, Prepared for Shell Oil
Company. March.
ENSR Corporation. 2004a. Initial Vapor Migration Pathway Assessment Work Plan, Hartford Area Hydrocarbon Plume Site,
Hartford, Illinois. February 20.
ENSR Corporation. 2004b. Addendum - Initial Vapor Migration Pathway Assessment Work Plan, Hartford Area Hydrocarbon
Plume Site, Hartford, Illinois. June 25.
ENSR Corporation. 2004c. Vapor Migration Pathway Assessment Report, Hartford Area Hydrocarbon Plume Site, Hartford,
Illinois. October 29.
ENSR Corporation. 2005. Soil Vapor Investigation Report, Hartford Area Hydrocarbon Plume Site, Hartford, Illinois. May 26.
ENSR Corporation and Bureau Veritas. (ENSR et al.). 2005. “Draft Effectiveness Monitoring Plan”
Correspondence received by United States Environmental Protection Agency, December 9.
ENSR-AECOM. 2006. “Time Series Analysis and Statistical Evaluation of Meteorological Phenomena on the Incidence of Reported
Vapor Events” Memorandum received by the Hartford Working Group, September 25.
ENSR-AECOM. 2007. Revised Effectiveness Monitoring Plan. June 12.
ENSR-AECOM. 2008. Documentation for the Removal of Homes from the Effectiveness Monitoring Program, Hartford
Hydrocarbon Plume Site, Hartford, Illinois. October 3.
H2A. 2006. LNAPL Recharge and Production Investigation, The Hartford Area Hydrocarbon Plume Site, Hartford, Illinois.
January. (Appendix D to Clayton 2006 Proposal for Active LNAPL Recovery System).
Hartford Working Group (HWG). 2004. Hartford Working Group Contingency Plan. February 9.
Hartford Working Group (HWG). 2007. Hartford Working Group Contingency Plan. Revised. March 14.
Hartford Working Group (HWG). 2008. Hartford Working Group Contingency Plan. Revised. April 1.
Illinois Attorney General. 2003. “Underground Petroleum Contamination in North Hartford/Former
Clark Oil Refinery and Pipelines.” Correspondence received by Apex Oil Company, January 31.
Illinois Department of Public Health. (Illinois DPH). 2003. Public Health Assessment: Response to Vapors in Hartford Homes,
Hartford, Madison County, Illinois. May 19.
Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC). 2014. Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Fundamentals of Screening,
Investigation, and Management. October 2014.
Johnson, P., Lundegard, P., and Liu, Z (Johnson et al.). 2006a. Source Zone Natural Attenuation at Petroleum Hydrocarbon Spill
Sites - I: Site-Specific Assessment Approach. Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation, 26(4), 82-92. Fall.
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP). 2016. Light Nonaqueous Phase Liquids (LNAPL) and MCP:
Guidance for Site Assessment and Closure (Policy #WSC-16-450). February 19.
John Mathes & Associates, Inc. (Mathes). 1979. Engineering Investigation Report, Clark Oil Refinery Hartford, Illinois.
December 18.
RAM Group of Gannett Fleming, Inc. (Gannett Fleming). 2009. Quarterly Groundwater Sampling and Gauging, Village of
Hartford. June 2009.
RAM Group of Gannett Fleming, Inc. (Gannett Fleming). 2013a. In-Home Mitigation Measures, 107 W. Birch Street, Hartford,
Illinois. Submitted via email. May 31.
RAM Group of Gannett Fleming, Inc. (Gannett Fleming) 2013b. In-Home Mitigation Measures, 125 W. Birch Street, Hartford,
Illinois. Submitted via email. May 31.
RAM Group of Gannett Fleming, Inc. (Gannett Fleming) 2013c. In-Home Mitigation Measures, 129 W. Birch Street, Hartford,
Illinois. Submitted via email. May 31.
Spragg, Kirk (Leapfrog). “Leapfrog Interpolation Basics”. Leapfrog Blog Post May 8, 2013. Viewed June 7, 2016.
St. John-Mittelhauser & Associates, Inc. 2017. 2016 Annual Progress Report Including Fourth Quarter 2016 Premcor Main
Facility. February 28.
Trihydro Corporation (Trihydro). 2013. Dissolved Phase Investigation Work Plan, Hartford Petroleum Release Site, Hartford,
Illinois. August 9.
Trihydro Corporation (Trihydro). 2014a. “Final Interim In-Home Effectiveness Monitoring Plan, Hartford Petroleum Release Site,
Hartford, Illinois”. Correspondence received by United States Environmental Protection Agency, January 3.
Trihydro Corporation (Trihydro). 2014b. Revised LNAPL Component to the Conceptual Site Model, Hartford Petroleum Release
Site, Hartford, Illinois. May 22.
Trihydro Corporation (Trihydro). 2015a. “Summary of Soil Vapor Extraction System Effectiveness Zone 1 Expansion,
Hartford Petroleum Release Site, Hartford, Illinois”. Correspondence received by United States Environmental
Protection Agency, June 2.
Trihydro Corporation (Trihydro). 2015b. Final Vapor Collection System Operation, Maintenance, and Monitoring Plan, Hartford
Petroleum Release Site, Hartford, Illinois. September 4.
Trihydro Corporation (Trihydro). 2015c. Additional Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid Recovery Pilot Test Summary Report.
September 10.
Trihydro Corporation (Trihydro). 2015d. Semiannual Soil Vapor Extraction System Operations, Monitoring, And Maintenance
Report, Hartford Petroleum Release Site, Hartford, Illinois. November 23.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1989. Estimating Air Emissions from Petroleum UST Cleanups.
Office of Underground Storage Tanks, Washington, D.C., June.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2002. Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air
Pathway from Groundwater and Soils. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.
EPA/530/F-02/052. November 2002.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2012. EPA’s Vapor Intrusion Database: Evaluation and Characterization
of Attenuation Factors for Chlorinated Volatile Organic Compounds and Residential Buildings. Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Washington, DC (EPA/530/R-10/002). March 2012.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2015. Assessing and Mitigating the Vapor Intrusion Pathway from
Subsurface Vapor Sources to Indoor Air. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C. OSWER
Publication 9200.2-154. June 2015.
USEPA. 2018. Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (VISL) Calculator. Available from: USEPA via the Internet:
https://www.epa.gov/vaporintrusion. Assessed March 2018.
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Tetra Tech. (USEPA et al.). 2010. Innovations in Site Characterization,
Streamlining Cleanup at Vapor Intrusion and Product Removal Sites Using the Triad Approach, Hartford Plume Site,
Hartford, Illinois. September.
URS Corporation. 2014. Effectiveness Monitoring Plan, Hartford Hydrocarbon Plume Site, Hartford, Illinois. November 11.
WSP Environment & Energy. (WSP). 2012. Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid Recovery Pilot Test Interim Report, Apex Oil
Company, Inc., Hartford, Illinois. July 5.